Most networks have grown through decisions that made sense at the time. We help you redesign for service, cost, working capital and resilience, with the trade-offs made visible.

Networks evolve through growth, acquisitions and changing customer demands. Over time, what once enabled growth becomes a source of cost, complexity and excess inventory.
Service, cost and working capital pull against each other. Making those trade-offs visible and quantified is how leaders make them deliberately.
Selected examples from engagements led by members of the Cinc team.
A frozen meals business had several sites running at medium to low utilisation, with ageing technology and high labour intensity. We modelled network scenarios covering asset, overhead, operating and supply chain costs, then designed a consolidated site masterplan.
Each stage of the consolidation was phased to an attractive payback, and the first phase went to the board for approval.
a year in cost benefits from phase one
asset utilisation
discounted payback
A common service model was being applied across customers with materially different economics. Cinc analysed the cost-to-serve, designed a more differentiated service model and supported implementation.
The resulting program generated approximately $50 million in benefits over three years while maintaining customer outcomes.
supply chain benefits over three years
Good supply chain decisions combine data, scenario modelling and practical operating experience.
Build a fact base of volumes, flows, costs, inventory and service performance across the end-to-end network.
Test scenarios for footprint, sourcing, inventory and service, quantifying the cost, service, capital and risk of each.
Work with leaders to choose deliberately, with a clear view of what each option delivers and what it gives up.
Sequence the changes, embed planning and governance disciplines, and keep optimising as conditions change.
Supply chains rarely start with a blank sheet of paper.
Most organisations inherit a network that has evolved over many years through acquisitions, growth, customer demands, operational constraints and countless decisions that made sense at the time.
The challenge is that the environment those decisions were made in often no longer exists.
Customer expectations change. Product portfolios expand. Costs increase. New channels emerge. Supply disruptions occur. Strategic priorities shift. Yet the underlying network often remains largely unchanged.
What once enabled growth can gradually become a source of complexity, unnecessary cost, excess inventory and service challenges.
In our experience, many supply chain problems are not caused by poor execution.
They are the result of a network and operating model that no longer aligns with the needs of the business.
Organisations frequently focus on improving individual functions such as procurement, warehousing, transport, planning or inventory management. While these initiatives can create value, they rarely address the broader question:
Does the supply chain still support the strategy?
Our role is to help organisations answer that question and make better end-to-end decisions.
We work with clients to evaluate network design, inventory strategy, service models, planning processes and supply chain performance. Using data, scenario modelling and practical operational experience, we help organisations understand the trade-offs between cost, service, working capital, growth and resilience.
A core part of this work is making those trade-offs visible.
Many organisations pursue objectives that sound desirable but are inherently contradictory: lower cost, higher service, broader product ranges, faster delivery and greater flexibility. When the consequences of those choices are not quantified, decisions are often driven by assumptions, urgency or organisational silos rather than evidence.
By making trade-offs explicit, leaders can make deliberate decisions with a clearer understanding of the outcomes those decisions create.
This is where supply chain optimisation creates some of its greatest value.
Not simply through better analysis, but by improving the quality of decision-making across the organisation.
We also place significant focus on working capital performance.
Inventory is often one of the largest uses of capital within a business, yet inventory outcomes are ultimately a product of broader supply chain decisions. Network design, planning assumptions, service targets, sourcing strategies and operational disciplines all influence how much capital becomes tied up in stock. By addressing these drivers systemically, organisations can often improve service while simultaneously reducing inventory and releasing working capital.
The most effective supply chains are not those that optimise a single objective.
They are those that consistently make the right trade-offs to support customer expectations, strategic goals and economic performance.
The philosophy that underpins our approach is explored in our article Supply Chain Network Design: A Capability, Not a Crisis Response.
Clients typically engage us when supply chain costs are increasing, inventory levels continue to rise, service performance is under pressure, or leadership teams are questioning whether their current network is capable of supporting future strategic objectives.
In some cases, the supply chain has simply evolved over time and has never been reviewed as an integrated system. In others, significant changes such as growth, acquisitions, channel expansion, margin pressure or changing customer expectations have exposed limitations that were previously hidden.
These challenges are rarely solved through isolated functional improvements alone.
They require an understanding of how decisions made in one part of the supply chain affect performance across the entire system, and the ability to make trade-offs consciously rather than by default.
Our team helps organisations evaluate those trade-offs, quantify the implications of different options and translate strategic intent into practical supply chain decisions.
Beyond individual projects, we help organisations build the capability, governance and decision-making disciplines required to continually optimise supply chain performance as conditions change.
The result is a supply chain that better supports the organisation's strategy, improved service performance, lower operating costs, reduced working capital requirements and greater confidence in the decisions that shape future performance.
Network design decides how many factories, warehouses and distribution points you need, where they should be and how products flow between them. It sets the cost, service and inventory profile of the supply chain for years, which is why it is worth revisiting as the business changes.
Typically after acquisitions, significant growth or channel change, when costs or inventory are rising faster than volume, or when leaders are unsure the network can support the strategy. Many networks have never been reviewed as an integrated system.
Inventory is an outcome of upstream decisions: service targets, planning assumptions, lead times, sourcing and network design. Addressing those drivers and setting inventory policy by product and customer segment often lets organisations reduce stock and improve availability at the same time.
By quantifying them. We model each option’s effect on cost, service, working capital and risk so leaders can see what they gain and give up, and choose deliberately rather than by default.
Not to start. Most of the data needed already sits in ERP, warehouse and transport systems. We build the scenario models the decision needs and only recommend tools where they will support recurring decisions.
We help sequence and implement the changes, and build the S&OP, governance and decision disciplines that keep the supply chain optimised as conditions change.
A focused working session can test where your network, inventory and service model are out of step with the strategy.